Saturday, April 20, 2019

New York Times headline April 20, 2019



Notre-Dame’s Safety Planners Underestimated the Risk, With Devastating Results
By KATRIN BENNHOLD and JAMES GLANZ
The man who oversaw the design of the fire safety system at the cathedral said he was “stunned” at the fire’s speed. Experts said the system included delays that cost firefighters critical minutes

Monday, April 15, 2019

Where we came from


Light on the path; or, The way heavenward
By John Kirk
1889


REVIVALS of religion are of various kinds. The people in one case are moved with a deep sense of sin; in another by the anticipation of judgment and the future punishment of the wicked; and yet again the revival may be got up simply by the exertions of a few people who think it is time that such a movement should be taking place. A fourth way in which a revival of religion may be brought about is through the revelation to some individual of the bright side of divine things. By Providence this man is put in such circumstances that the Divine mercy becomes apparent to him as it had not been before; that mercy and loving-kindness in the Gospel becomes so magnified that he is constrained to tell others about it. The results of this realisation of God's goodness upon himself being strength... purity, and joy unbounded, he feels, as he regards the cold and dead condition of multitudes of Christians and the darkness of the lost and sinful, that were they, his fellow-creatures, but to see in their God what he sees, they must also experience joy and strength. As a live coal laid upon a heap of faggots, so is this man amongst his fellows The flame of truth catches everywhere, and perhaps not only is a Church revived but a nation born...

Wednesday, April 3, 2019

Just a thought


Is the reality of human consciousness any more absurd than the illusion of survival after death?

Sunday, March 31, 2019

Jan's story about the ants eating the map, rather than the picnic


How obvious is it that if you speak, you are speaking TO someone?

How obvious is it that the audience, even a presumed audience is a critical part of language?

Have we forgotten that to say 'I got that', means you have not?

How obvious is it to say 'I heard that before', is to advertise one's  incomprehension?

How obvious is it that one reason for originality is to reach those who spout the sentiments above, spout out of their helpless mechanicity?

Wednesday, February 6, 2019

"How to do fact checking"


https://blog.oup.com/2019/02/fact-checking-how-to/?

I excerpt this article below, and conclude, afterwards, with my own observations.

'I’ve been doing some fact-checking of my own lately for a book project and have a few tips.

'If you don’t know, don’t assume. Is guerilla originally a French word or Spanish? I once assumed it was French, not bothering to check. But it turned out to be Spanish.

'Don’t be misled by terminology. I once referred to the Soviet Revolution as occurring in October of 1917, based on the notion that it was the October Revolution. But that’s only true on the Old Style calendar; on the New Style calendar, the revolution took place in November 1917.

'Beware of common knowledge. What we think we know may not be the whole story. Take the simple statement that Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press. He was involved, to be sure, and a key player. But he was not a lone artisan (he had financial backers supporting him and skilled craftsmen working for him) and it is more accurate to say that he devised a revolutionary method of printing with mechanical movable type.

'Learn what needs checking. For any project, keep a list of the kinds of things that need to be verified: names, dates, places, arithmetic, and more. Names shift in your memory: Is it Pacific Crest Trail or Pacific Coast Trail? Dates can lead you down a garden path—a film might have been produced in one year and released in the next. Someone elected in 1980 would have taken office in 1981. ...

'Look for original sources. Information mutates from source to source, so it is preferable to find the original source. Where that isn’t possible, look for the best source possible—something that is peer reviewed or fact-checked.

'Ask for help. Reach out to librarians, archivists, and other scholars. ....

'Be wary of quotes. Something is often up when a quote appears more than one way...

'Admit defeat when necessary. When you’ve determined that something is unverified or in dispute, say so. There’s no shame in being uncertain.

'Inevitably, you will make a mistake, misread a source, or get fooled. When that happens, someone will correct you and it is best to admit the error, say thank you, make a correction if possible, and learn the lesson. Mistakes can happen to anyone, but every slip is a learning experience.'


I mention this quotation because the article appeared on the Oxford University Press blog. That glorious source is the reason I point out--- in what is perhaps a commentary on our times-- this advice is pathetically inadequate.  The author of this article ignores the internet--- which is where the ghastly results of human gullibility and ignorance are blatant. At the same time the web makes elementary fact checking much easier. And the article ignores how reliance on others as a warrant, is deadly to ordinary, even ordinary, knowledge. Pictures of cats is just an example--- the signs of manipulation are often obvious-- the smiling shape of a cat mouth, the extended forelimbs, over the head, of the beast---- a simple observation of a cat would reveal the presence of computer manipulation of these images. Many people are not just oblivious to the phony, they seem to see no reason to check anything.

Did I say gullible, ignorant, above. I meant to say ordinary.
And what could be more ordinary than to be cranky and/or surprised, by this topic.

Tuesday, January 22, 2019

Look it up--- UP

shareds: collective noun. definition- the discardable debris left when thinking through something
shareds: synonym- words

Wednesday, January 9, 2019

To be precise

Those people going on about robots,now, and the last few decades, those folks ARE robots.