We quote now from a National Geographic blog
Take two people with identical genes and put them in different environments, and some of their genes may respond in different ways. That's long been a good counterargument against genetic hyper-determinism.
Oh really. I like this quote because it simply states an assumption apparent in much writing about science--- this concern about preserving man's free will. In this case, if we tug at his argument, it may show up sloppy thinking. The idea is that greater complexity is an avenue for greater freedom for the individual. Yet how could that be. Greater complexity just mean more intricate genetic functioning. Greater complexity mean tighter determinism not a lapse from "hyper-determinism." It seems so obvious, but that is because I heard Jan Cox discussing causality occasionally. Relevant here is his pointing out that there is no genetic inside and environmental outside. That environment outside you, it is just more genetics. So obvious, what is outside us, it is genetic also.
This kind of blatant disregard for reality, is something to ponder, another time.